With training, neural control of a powered prosthetic ankle can restore a wide range of abilities, including standing on very challenging surfaces and squatting, researchers from North Carolina State University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill suggest, in Wearable Technologies.

“This case study shows that it is possible to use these neural control technologies, in which devices respond to electrical signals from a patient’s muscles, to help patients using robotic prosthetic ankles move more naturally and intuitively.”

— Helen Huang, corresponding author of the study. Huang is the Jackson Family Distinguished Professor in the Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering at NC State and UNC

“This work demonstrates that these technologies can give patients the ability to do more than we previously thought possible.”

— Aaron Fleming, first author of the study and a PhD candidate in the joint biomedical engineering department

Most of the existing research on robotic prosthetic ankles has focused solely on walking using autonomous control. Autonomous control, in this context, means that while the person wearing the prosthesis decides whether to walk or stand still, the fine movements involved in those movements happen automatically – rather than because of anything the wearer is doing, a media release from North Carolina State University notes.

Add More Possibilities

Huang, Fleming and their collaborators wanted to know what would happen if an amputee, working with a physical therapist, trained with a neurally controlled powered prosthetic ankle on activities that are challenging with typical prostheses. Would it be possible for amputees to regain a fuller range of control in the many daily motions that people make with their ankles in addition to walking, the release asks.

The powered prosthesis in this study reads electrical signals from two residual calf muscles. Those calf muscles are responsible for controlling ankle motion. The prosthetic technology uses a control paradigm developed by the researchers to convert electrical signals from those muscles into commands that control the movement of the prosthesis.

Performed with Ease and Stability

The researchers worked with a study participant who had lost one leg about halfway between the knee and the ankle. The participant was fitted with the powered prosthetic ankle and did an initial evaluation. The patient then had five training sessions with a physical therapist, each lasting about two hours, over the course of two-and-a-half weeks. After the training was completed, the participant did a second evaluation.

This image shows the study participant performing a squatting activity with different prosthetic devices, the release notes. When the participant used his daily prosthesis (left picture) he had a limited range of motion and had to bend his back significantly to lift objects off the ground. When using a neural controlled prosthetic ankle (right picture) he was able to voluntarily control his prosthesis ankle joint force and angle and keep a healthy posture while lifting weight from the ground.

After training, the study participant was able to do a variety of tasks that had been difficult before, such as going from sitting to standing without any external assistance or squatting to pick something up off the ground without compensating for the movement with other body parts. But one of the most pronounced differences was the study participant’s stability, whether standing or moving. This was reflected in both empirical evaluations – such as testing the patient’s stability when standing on foam – and in the patient’s level of confidence in his own stability.

“The concept of mimicking natural control of the ankle is very straightforward. But implementation of this concept is more complicated. It requires training people to use residual muscles to drive new prosthetic technologies. The results in this case study were dramatic. This is just one study, but it shows us what is feasible.”

— Helen Huang

“There is also a profound emotional impact when people use powered prosthetic devices that are controlled by reading the electrical signals that their bodies are making. It is much more similar to the way people move intuitively, and that can make a big difference in how people respond to using a prosthesis at all.”

— Aaron Fleming

The researchers are already having more people go through the training paradigm and are expanding their testing to assess the results of that training.

Before making this technology more widely available, the researchers also want to engage in real-world beta testing – with people using the robotic prosthesis during their daily routines.

“As with any prosthetic device for lower limbs, you have to make sure the device is consistent and reliable, so that it doesn’t fail when people are using it.”

— Helen Huang

“Powered prostheses that exist now are very expensive and are not covered by insurance. So there are issues related to access to these technologies. By attempting to restore normal control of these type of activities, this technology stands to really improve quality of life and community participation for individuals with amputation. This would make these expensive devices more likely to be covered by insurance in the future if it means improving the overall health of the individual.”

— Aaron Fleming

[Source(s): North Carolina State University, EurekAlert; photos courtesy of Aaron Fleming]

Related Content:
Algorithm Developed That Helps Enable Powered Prosthetics to Tune Themselves Automatically
Powered Orthotic with Shoulder Assist Leads the Pack of New Products from Abilitech Medical
Powered Prosthetic Responds On the Fly to Environmental Changes